Still there are people like Matthew Henry who actually is going with my interpretation. But then I guess he was a dishonest minister and author of the "Exposition of the Old and New Testaments"
No, but we KNOW what society DID. By the time the Supreme Court got into it the whole thing was already in full bloom in the South.
So jail certain immigrants immediately if they come to a port of entry and its discovered they have a criminal record in another country?
I hit it over the right field wall, Trumptard.
We have the same thing going on in the airlines now, with people bringing their own food on the plane.
She's actually part horse.
Lol. Typical ignorant comment from the uniformed.
You're a mess.
Yes, I've listened to many of his podcasts. I'm a very big fan of Jung, Dostoyevski, Solzenhitsyn and Eliade. All guys he cites all the time, so I had to listen to him - our thinking has, in many ways, been forged by many of the same sources. I use the same approach to mythology and religion as he does, and enjoy hearing his views. I hadn't heard him talk of an afterlife though. That's why I was surprised to see him mentioned and am asking...
Melanie looks like she could use a sammich.
Play more video games to take your mind off things you have little or no control over. In games we have a sense of control even if it is small.
Math don?t require faith, math actually have proofs :-)
not what she was convicted of
You mean the parts of the old law that were inconvenient or unattractive to new followers in Paul's time fade away.
hes got to hold it against someone,,the milkman called the police!
The sting you speak of is what the police and prosecutors are using for the indictment. Justice works methodically if not slowly.
Just a cold hard fact.
True. It's just a weird headline. Plenty of grandparents are in jail, and remain there.
'Should' is one thing, but the law says they cant (at least not systematically). If ONE Indian is being an asshole, its not like you can refuse to serve ALL Indians.
Q2: If there was an entity having some superior method of cognition, it would be futile to explain it's motives using logic.
You don't hear much about that cherry-picked global warming "pause" any more.
So when it comes to illegal aliens you want the president to follow a policy ignoring the law. When it comes to federal grants you want the president to follow the law. Interesting.
Only fools believe that their 'holy book' is correct and all others are not.
Not if it would be motivated purely by their religion. First Amendment and all that.
Jesus was human
Micro devolution. As humans became increasingly distant from the pure state of Adam and Eve before the Fall lifespans decreased.
Wow, now you have to go back 3 presidents before you've got a talking point? Come on C, you can do better than that!
seriously, his 15min is up. let a girl who wants to arm wrestle him be the biggest headline he can get.
If they stop using Roman coins, there will be nothing to pay taxes with. The two monetary systems would be decoupled.
There's a world of difference. One is verified and reproducible in a lab and the other isn't.
But don't snitches get stitches?
That's just plain ridiculous.
You get to the point you have to starting having apps to track your spending and bills you got problems anyway
You are half correct. I do enjoy debating issues, and for the most part, that's sort of the point of this medium... If nothing else, a discussion such as this provides an opportunity to hone the art of rhetoric, improve the ability to articulate, and ideally, to get everyone to think more deeply about issues and formulate their own individual opinions whatever they may be, and form the ability to vigorously defend them with logical arguments.
Have you talked to a divorce attorney?