The "big deal" is that this is a perfect illustration of your hysterical conservative zealotry.
Only way to eat eggs!
Has someone come out in opposition to the anthem?
You want to fantasize go ahead. Leave the foundation of our country alone. I'd counter your points with reality but you'd just ignore it again.
Just think of all those homeless PTSD vets. Frickin losers all. They should just buck up.
I had a "Bible as Literature" course once. Quite enlightening. *Really* pissed off a zealot couple, who dropped it after like four classes. My point is that *they* so seldom look at it as anything but "divine inspiration" and specifically *not* metaphorical. It isn't "stories" to them, so the critical techniques of literature do not apply (for them.) It isn't art to them, but really something that approaches their version of science (and history, simultaneously. That's why they so facilely accuse scientists of belief systems -- it's all addled together in their heads.) It's been rehashed so many times, that decent prose you mention is the work of translators and reinterpreters, even as other editors have come up with truly ugly English versions of some of the same passages.
And Andrew, confirms every ugly stereotype of Trump Supporters, every day, 7 days a week. He's the gift that keeps on giving!
I watched. It was.
it is, but she raises my hopes and then doesn't go through, it's like when she says "I dare you jump over the train lines when the train is coming, I'll do you a BJ if you do that!" I go ahead and do what ever thing she dares me to and I've never seen the BJ, she owes me like at least 5 BJs! XD
Which makes absolute sense. He is claiming there are people who are IGNORANT of the actual mechanisms behind the evolutionary process, that are worried about considering other non-Darwinian mechanisms opening the door to creationists. It is their IGNORANCE that causes them to think that way. People who know the details of the Theory(like Stewart Newman) do NOT agree with that outlook.
Here are contradictions.
What baloney? Im pointing out gradualism and natural selection are both doubted, that many are looking elsewhere. No one said it topples evolution. They look elsewhere! Im saying...look into the Bible. That's it
There is no baby at that time, and it certainly can not make a "choice". It is also a invader in an already born persons body and as such it has no rights to that body, just as no one has any right to force you to donate an organ or blood to save their dying 1 month old.
No worries....it's been a weird Monday.
Well, if it sounds a bit to supernatural then it likely is. Virgin birth, water to wine, rib to person, parting of seas and rising from the dead can't really happen. So it's made up or these events actually occurred and were misinterprited. I lean towards parts of AAT .
This is much more complicated than that. There are children being sent on therir own & adults w/them, no
Absolutely, it also seeps into our politicians. In America politicians contend that there should be separation of church and state, how many times do we see religious convictions and political issues intersect in such a way that religion cannot possibly be separated from the state?
I can't stop you from defending child abuse so you got that part right
good to know
Just as long as we don't Dip here we will survive!
"IMPORTANT: I?m NOT talking about how you subjectively know. I?m asking how you objectively know. Knowledge is a sacred notion, a precious commodity, so don't treat it lightly."
Yes, a most likely mostly fictional character featured in the NT. Read it objectively and you will soon see the fictive construction.
Actually, yes. It's been done. No C-14 to be found. TFCC is basing his claims on data released by CRSEF, or Creation Research, Science Education Foundation, led by Hugh Miller.
Thank you! it was on the tip of my thoughts.
Indeed it is impossible to imagine an existence outside of time but fortunately we don't have to IMAGINE it. We are EXPERIENCING it 24/7 as the present moment NOW. The 'now' is not in time. It is the stationary platform from which the passing of time is viewed.
Speak for yourself chum. I find that family, enough money to keep me in relative comfort and the English Premier League (not to mention books and TV) are all components of a satisfying life. I have never felt any need to bow down to some imaginary god.
Ooooowwwww gravity! One of my nemesis
What gives you the idea that any shop owner must approve of someone in order to sell them a product? The whole idea is bizarre to me.
Its accumulation of mutation over time more than likely. We humans alone pass down 100 or so to our kids. They add up, degenerate code, prevents change. That's the limiting factor of all genomes, but what keeps it bound to families? These 'galaxies of stars' like genetics has confirmed? Easy..Gods word. :) according to kinds.
I provided many cogent examples, the rest is up to you.
Agreed. He couldn?t take down obama.
I'm not a fan of loud noises