What you believe you know. If there's something I'm familiar with on these forums, it's people with a completely unearned sense of absolute knowledge.
Hey Sly, what's new and wonderful?
Since you probably know hermeneutics, you'll be able to provide this illuminating explanation yourself.
Thank you for that interesting example. It sounds like a fascinating subject. My niece does the same thing as you. She has build a family genealogy going back many generations. I must have a long discussion about it with her :-)
He always say ' I'm libertarian' in all his posts :) but sides with the left on everything. lol
LOLOLOL people just throw them away
That is the point, no new "forces" will change the dynamics of everyday living as we understand them...let alone supernature...
Dude, I am not Jewish. Where do you get such stupid ideas...oh that's right you have a silly and unrealistic hatred of Jews.
"There is no meaningful judgment of your life."
Christianity does not require adherent suspension of reality or to abandon reason. If you had any experience looking at Christology you would find the exact opposite is true. Christian philosophers literally consider Christ the logos. You know what the logos is right? It is Greek for "The way of reason." Christ was killed for what he said. His followers were too. Their killers were the unreasonable ones. And by fulfilling your position as the anti-christian does, you are also being unreasonable. GO, LOOK IT UP. Quit spitting ad hominem at me. You are the loser here.
Spoken like someone who can't even define basic terms.
Well, that's for SCOTUS to decide, which they didn't this time.
Compliant? The verbal part of the SAT gave you trouble, didn't it. Oh, you aren't taking it for a couple of years. Splains a lot.
Mother Theresa was very good at raising money and opening new sites, but she did absolutely nothing for the dying except to give them a place to die. She never gave anyone so much as an asprin to help with pain because she believed that pain and suffering brought one closer to god. She simply let people die instead of actually helping them. There was no distinction whatever made between very treatable illness and terminal diseases, no quarantine of tuberculosis patients, no sterilization of needles, and she was far more interested in baptising the dying, than she was in actually treating disease. She was a dogmatic control freak who read mail addressed to others. Her canonization was completely bogus with at least one of the supposed miracles debunked by the woman miraculously cured by her own husband
Atheism can not support any moral framework and cant even begin to condemn it whatsoever.
That she forgot to return my handcuffs.
Why don't you just use the word "Fleeing", because then you can still flee if a murderer happens to swing by
Props for the effort!
I said nothing about God. I just suggested instead of concentrating on the judgemental punishment of entire populations they should refresh the